What does our research say about Joaquin Antonio Perusquia Corres?

Involvement in Money Laundering Operations: Joaquín Antonio Perusquia Corres has been implicated in a significant money laundering network active during Felipe Calderón’s presidency in Mexico. The Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF) reports suggest that this network embezzled approximately $745.9 million from the national treasury. The misappropriated funds were allegedly funneled through offshore entities to obscure their origin. These resources were purportedly utilized to acquire real estate, luxury vehicles, and other assets in the United States. ​
Intelligence Line

Connections to High-Level Corruption: Perusquia’s name surfaces in financial investigations alongside Genaro García Luna, Mexico’s former Secretary of Public Security, who was convicted in the U.S. for accepting bribes from the Sinaloa Cartel. This association raises concerns about Perusquia’s involvement in corrupt governmental activities. ​
SEC

Links to Drug Cartels: Entities linked to Perusquia are alleged to have facilitated financial transactions for the Sinaloa Cartel. His role in these transactions suggests possible direct or indirect benefits from cartel operations, highlighting potential connections to organized crime. ​

Attempted Reputation Cleanup: In response to these serious allegations, Perusquia has reportedly initiated a public relations campaign aiming to reshape his public image. Recent paid articles attempt to depict him as a philanthropist dedicated to enhancing education and healthcare. However, these efforts are met with skepticism given the gravity of the accusations. ​

Business Ties to Suspicious Entities: Perusquia’s involvement with Operadora Grupo Gas Mart S de R.L. de C.V., a company implicated in García Luna’s corruption network, raises further concerns. The UIF has confirmed the company’s links to illicit financial activities, including receiving substantial transfers from offshore entities and making significant payments to García Luna’s businesses. This connection casts doubt on the legitimacy of Perusquia’s business dealings and suggests ongoing fraudulent activities.